DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

Winamp 4

9 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/winamp-4.4558/

T
tushar_novice Original post #1
Jan 11, 2005 at 2:35 PM
Hey guys,
Well I was looking through my hard disk.
In the softwares section I saw I had winamp 1,2,3,5.
So I decided to download the winamp4.
But it was nowhere on the net.
Also I never heard about the version.
After 3 came 5.
Where the hell did winamp 4 go?
Can anybody answer please??????
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
S
Jan 11, 2005 at 2:40 PM
Winamp 3 + Winamp 2 = Winamp 5 ... Got it !!!
X
x10d #4
Jan 11, 2005 at 5:06 PM
Sachin, i think, u shud complain Nullsoft Guys abt this.

they too must know abt ur new invention ! :evil:
F
Jan 11, 2005 at 5:17 PM
tushar_novice said:
Hey guys,
Well I was looking through my hard disk.
In the softwares section I saw I had winamp 1,2,3,5.
So I decided to download the winamp4.
But it was nowhere on the net.
Also I never heard about the version.
After 3 came 5.
Where the hell did winamp 4 go?
Can anybody answer please??????
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

aammmmmmmmmmmm........................ I DID'NT UNDERSTAND UR QUERY. PLZ BE CLEAR.
U say, u were "looking through" ur hard disk, then u say that u found winamp 1, 2, 3, 5, but cud'nt find d 4th version

wat dya mean???
S
Jan 11, 2005 at 5:46 PM
x10d said:
Sachin, i think, u shud complain Nullsoft Guys abt this.

they too must know abt ur new invention ! :evil:

LOL
S
Jan 11, 2005 at 5:47 PM
Winamp 2 + Winamp 3's new skin support and additional features combinedly appeared as Winamp 5...
Sorry for 2 posts :?
T
Jan 12, 2005 at 2:27 PM
Wat the hell!!
This is software world not the mathematics world where 2+3 is5.
P
pimpom #9
Jan 12, 2005 at 9:56 PM
Winamp was fine upto 2.9x, after that came v3 which was not simply a continuation of 2.9x but incorporated some new techniques that was buggy and didn't work out too well.

For reasons best known to themselves, Nullsoft decided to jump to v5 and skipped 4. My guess is that they wanted to avoid confusion or wanted to create a strong impression that v5 has no connection with v3.