DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

x2 3800+ vs. intel 930 d

4 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/x2-3800-vs-intel-930-d.30114/

K
killzone Original post #1
Jun 13, 2006 at 7:26 PM
amd is usually a killer machine in gamin.but comparin these two

price performance ratio x2 3800+ is costly n 930d nearly gives a 90% performance n uses a 65nm processor


so my q is

which one is better
even im a amd lover
but in this case u answer???
D
Jun 13, 2006 at 8:09 PM
It depends on your usage. If you're into gaming and don't mind spending a little extra, then go for the X2 3800+. If you just want a fast proccy for general usage then save money and go for Intel.

PS AMD has announced massive price cuts on all their proccys after Conroe releases. If you wait a little you could get that X2 3800+ for a whole lot less.
dOm1naTOr
Jun 13, 2006 at 9:08 PM
As AMD procs(single as well as dual core) run at relatively lower clocks than Intel nd ferforms as better(or greater) there is theoritically more room for overclocking as temp in not a big problem as Intel nd so AMD is oc friendly nd may give better results.
So I suggest X2 3800+ nd oc it from 2.0Ghz to 2.5 or 2.6Ghz with stock cooling with good ventillation or even higher clocks with a good copper heatsink fan combo.
G
gxsaurav #4
Jun 14, 2006 at 11:43 AM
remember that the Athlon 3800+ X2 will emit less temprature