DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

XBMC : Open Media Center

30 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/xbmc-open-media-center.90077/

Dark Star
Dark Star Original post #1
Jun 9, 2008 at 2:56 PM
*www.imgx.org/files/17869_aw27o/XBMC_Logo.png​

XBMC (formerly named "Xbox Media Center") is a free and open source cross-platform media-player and entertainment hub. Initially created for the original Xbox game-console, though recently, the team behind XBMC development has ported the XBMC software to run natively under the Linux, Mac OS X, and Microsoft Windows operating-systems. XBMC is the successor to the popular Xbox Media Player (XBMP) software.

It can play an entire spectrum of media formats and includes playlists, audio visualizations, slideshows, and weather forecast functions. XBMC has become a mature graphical user interface replacement for the original Xbox Dashboard, and it is currently also being ported to run natively under Linux, Mac OS X, and Microsoft

*www.imgx.org/thumbs/large/17871_tr4ml/xbmc_ubuntu.png​

Features

XBMC can be used to play/view all common multimedia formats. It can decode these in software and optionally pass-through AC3/DTS audio from movies directly to S/PDIF output to an external audio-amplifier/receiver.

Supported formats/codecs:


  • Physical media: CDs, DVDs, Video CDs (including DVD-Video, VCD/SVCD and Audio-CD/CDDA)
  • Container formats: AVI, MPEG, WMV, ASF, FLV, MKV, MOV, MP4, M4A, AAC, NUT, Ogg, OGM, RealMedia RAM/RM/RV/RA/RMVB, 3gp, VIVO, PVA, NUV, NSV, NSA, FLI, FLC, and DVR-MS (beta support)
  • Video codecs: MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4 (SP and ASP, including DivX, XviD, 3ivx, DV, H.263), MPEG-4 AVC (H.264, including Nero Digital), HuffYUV, Indeo, MJPEG, RealVideo, QuickTime, Sorenson, WMV, Cinepak,
  • Audio codecs: AIFF, WAV/WAVE, MP2, MP3, AAC, AACplus, AC3, DTS, ALAC, AMR, FLAC, Monkey's Audio (APE), RealAudio, SHN, WavPack, MPC/Musepack/Mpeg+, Speex, Vorbis and WMA.
  • Digital picture/image formats: BMP, JPEG, GIF, PNG, TIFF, MNG, ICO, PCX and Targa/TGA
  • Subtitle formats: AQTitle, ASS/SSA, CC, JACOsub, MicroDVD, MPsub, OGM, PJS, RT, SMI, SRT, SUB, VOBsub, VPlayer


Video playback

XBMC uses two different multimedia player 'cores' for video-playback. The first is a ported version of the open source cross-platform player, MPlayer, which is known for playing practically all common media-formats. XBMC handles all codecs and containers normally supported by MPlayer (all FFmpeg supported codecs and also several external ones with the help of proprietary DLL-files.

*www.imgx.org/thumbs/large/17870_um5gq/XBMC_Main_Screen.png *www.imgx.org/thumbs/large/17872_hozka/XBMC.jpg *www.imgx.org/thumbs/large/17873_zqckj/xbmc_main_screenshot.jpg​


Gutsy Gibbon 7.10:
Code:
deb *ppa.launchpad.net/team-xbmc-gutsy/ubuntu gutsy main
deb-src *ppa.launchpad.net/team-xbmc-gutsy/ubuntu gutsy main

Hardy Heron 8.04:

Code:
deb *ppa.launchpad.net/team-xbmc-hardy/ubuntu hardy main
deb-src *ppa.launchpad.net/team-xbmc-hardy/ubuntu hardy main

Unstable:

Code:
deb *ppa.launchpad.net/team-xbmc/ubuntu gutsy main
deb-src *ppa.launchpad.net/team-xbmc/ubuntu gutsy main
deb *ppa.launchpad.net/team-xbmc/ubuntu hardy main
deb-src *ppa.launchpad.net/team-xbmc/ubuntu hardy main

SVN:

Code:
deb *ppa.launchpad.net/team-xbmc-svn/ubuntu gutsy main
deb-src *ppa.launchpad.net/team-xbmc-svn/ubuntu gutsy main
deb *ppa.launchpad.net/team-xbmc-svn/ubuntu hardy main
deb-src *ppa.launchpad.net/team-xbmc-svn/ubuntu hardy main

Home Page : XBMC //
MetalheadGautham
Jun 9, 2008 at 3:00 PM
heard of it.

its this thing that can play any format under the sun.

it has nearly every thinkable feature

still it was restricted by Xbox developers.. such a-holes

Its based on popular decoding engines available today
abhinandh
Jun 9, 2008 at 3:05 PM
was waithing for the linux port to get stabel.now...finally lemme test it.
EDIT: i cant try it cos no 64bit as of now.
and the wiki says that supported os in ubuntu only.(grr....as if it is the only distro in the world:mad:)
Dark Star
Jun 9, 2008 at 3:44 PM
Yep even I am pretty much pissed ! Can't people create it multi distro capable !! Even after Ubuntu decreasing popularity people sticks to Ubuntu

*www.imgx.org/files/17874_pxwx6/FF1.jpg
j1n M@tt
Jun 9, 2008 at 4:00 PM
ya people will always stick to Ubuntu wich hav a gud community support and easy of use......
Pat
Pat #6
Jun 9, 2008 at 4:18 PM
Yep even I am pretty much pissed ! Can't people create it multi distro capable !! Even after Ubuntu decreasing popularity people sticks to Ubuntu

*www.imgx.org/files/17874_pxwx6/FF1.jpg

Distrowatch PHR DOES NOT indicate the popularity of a distro!
Like it or not, Ubuntu is the most popular linux distro till date! :)
unni
unni #7
Jun 9, 2008 at 6:54 PM
XBMC sounds great. Will definitely give a try. Can it be used with TV tuner cards?
praka123
Jun 11, 2008 at 5:33 PM
why hate Ubuntu?because of Ubuntu ,Linux is spreading more!seriously!Ubuntu supports more hardware ,even some h/w manufacturers are noticing the popularity of this one distro.also deb+apt pwns every other distros!.

I think Hardy is not upto the mark though.

distros which should not be supported IMHO :
mint,ultimate edition etc.reason :it aint gonna help with all multimedia and restricted plugins installed.you have to first familiarize with Ubuntu and FOSS concept.

though I agree that ubuntu !=GNU/Linux.

there are other distros which too are good.but no one got the popularity of Ubuntu!reason -excellent support.

rpm distros are pita whatever you say!it takes more time to have it configured.also distros like mandriva,opensuse mess a lot with default UI features :evil:

Debian based distros are unmistakeably the best and easiest! :)
MetalheadGautham
Jun 11, 2008 at 6:02 PM
why hate Ubuntu?because of Ubuntu ,Linux is spreading more!seriously!Ubuntu supports more hardware ,even some h/w manufacturers are noticing the popularity of this one distro.also deb+apt pwns every other distros!.

I think Hardy is not upto the mark though.

distros which should not be supported IMHO :
mint,ultimate edition etc.reason :it aint gonna help with all multimedia and restricted plugins installed.you have to first familiarize with Ubuntu and FOSS concept.

though I agree that ubuntu !=GNU/Linux.

there are other distros which too are good.but no one got the popularity of Ubuntu!reason -excellent support.

rpm distros are pita whatever you say!it takes more time to have it configured.also distros like mandriva,opensuse mess a lot with default UI features :evil:

Debian based distros are unmistakeably the best and easiest! :)
+1

Although I hafta say Mandriva is NOT bad. Its much much better than SuSE and Fedora. It is the best RPM based distro as its URPMI rocks and provides apt like functionality.
infra_red_dude
Jun 18, 2008 at 6:55 PM
Been trying it out.. its been great.. I dunno whether its me or XBMC.. but I failed to find the navigation controls (play, stop, next, prev. etc.). Has a very professionally designed UI and effects.

Some screenshots (Warning - Each pic is about 400kB) :

*img357.imageshack.us/img357/5748/screenshot3mi2.th.png

*img515.imageshack.us/img515/3403/screenshot1dy1.th.png

*img357.imageshack.us/img357/2186/screenshotyj0.th.png
CadCrazy
CadCrazy #11
Jun 18, 2008 at 7:51 PM
Hmmm mac4lin 0.5 ????
CadCrazy
CadCrazy #13
Jun 18, 2008 at 8:35 PM
After ver 0.4 - straight to 1.0 ??
Screenshot dekhne ke bad to mujhe bhi chahiye hi chahiye :D (Kuch galat mat samajhna :D)
NucleusKore
Jun 18, 2008 at 8:44 PM
Been trying it out.. its been great.. I dunno whether its me or XBMC.. but I failed to find the navigation controls (play, stop, next, prev. etc.).

When watching a movie if you click on the screen you get a control box, if you right click it disappears.

When playing mp3 I could only control by click and right click, no buttons.

Overall I did not like it, interface is too fluid and not user friendly, guess it's made to be operated with a game pad.
infra_red_dude
Jun 18, 2008 at 9:26 PM
When playing mp3 I could only control by click and right click, no buttons.
Yep, thats what I was saying. Well the current version has gone thru a complete re-write, I think...

After ver 0.4 - straight to 1.0 ??
Screenshot dekhne ke bad to mujhe bhi chahiye hi chahiye :D (Kuch galat mat samajhna :D)
Yep! A quantum leap to ver.1.0 :D

Lol.. wait for a few dayz...
Zeeshan Quireshi
Jun 18, 2008 at 9:40 PM
why hate Ubuntu?because of Ubuntu ,Linux is spreading more!seriously!Ubuntu supports more hardware ,even some h/w manufacturers are noticing the popularity of this one distro.also deb+apt pwns every other distros!.

I think Hardy is not upto the mark though.

distros which should not be supported IMHO :
mint,ultimate edition etc.reason :it aint gonna help with all multimedia and restricted plugins installed.you have to first familiarize with Ubuntu and FOSS concept.

though I agree that ubuntu !=GNU/Linux.

there are other distros which too are good.but no one got the popularity of Ubuntu!reason -excellent support.

rpm distros are pita whatever you say!it takes more time to have it configured.also distros like mandriva,opensuse mess a lot with default UI features :evil:

Debian based distros are unmistakeably the best and easiest! :)
FOr the First time I agree with you Wholeheartedly Praka :D
Dark Star
Dark Star #17
Jun 19, 2008 at 7:46 AM
@ Ani : Does this Media Center do full Screen or not /?
MetalheadGautham
Jun 19, 2008 at 12:57 PM
FOr the First time I agree with you Wholeheartedly Praka :D
I am surprised you do.

Because firstly, RPM based distros are NOT bad. They are a great experience in themselves. Its in the RPM camp where all innovation takes place. Look at Fedora. Its RED HAT who does most of the dirty work on linux to make it more enterprise ready. You can always install apt/dpkg in Fedora and use it. Tonnes of work arounds exist to makr yum similar to apt-get, and most of them are worth the trouble.

Secondly, Mandriva is actually the BEST RPM based distro. It does not have dependency issues like Fedora since it uses the urpmi continer for rpm packages, and ensures apt like functionality. There is nothing wrong with giving a different menu, since users can always fallback to default.

Thirdly, I agree Ubuntu Ultimate Edition may not be upto it, but one can NEVER insult Linux Mint. Its not just Ubuntu + Codecs. If prakash wants to see "proper" mint, let him see the light edition. Linux Mint light vs Ubuntu Main will show that Linux Mint wins. Why ? Because its just easier to use, Feels more comfortable, and has an excellent set of themes. Its the greenish mint look, mint wallpapers, mint themes, mint menu and the mint tools that make linux mint what it is. Infact, after using lots of, and I mean lots of distros, I can safely say Mint appears to be the most friendly to use distro ever designed. In My Openion, linux mint is something like "the way ubuntu should have been".

And one must not forget that there DO exist other great desktop distros as well. Sidux is IMO the best desktop for a non beginner to intermediate stage user. PCLinuxOS is an excellent newbie distro, which is a classic example of a RED HAT based distro which uses .deb instead of .rpm . Slackware is the best example of linux at its sweet best. Vector Linux is the best light weight distro which still manages to offer great tools for nearly everything.

The reason many people like prakash (and me) are happy with debian sid is mainly this: Its pefect for lazy bones. Daily updates, everything automated, and a rolling release, so no need to use a CD to reinstall OS when new version comes out. And its light and has vast repositories. This makes it a perfect canditate for most people.

But, the fact still remains that "true" linux can't be experienced with anything ecept the hardcore category, which includes Crux, Arch, Gentoo, etc.


PS: WTH ? Am I writing a damn article here or what ?:x
Zeeshan Quireshi
Jun 19, 2008 at 2:45 PM
I'm not saying i Hate RPM Based distros , just that i've got used to the dpkg/apt toolset and am confortable using it .
infra_red_dude
Jun 19, 2008 at 8:09 PM
[Offtopic]

PCLinuxOS is an excellent newbie distro, which is a classic example of a RED HAT based distro which uses .deb instead of .rpm

PCLinuxOS uses apt-get and Synaptic frontend for RPM files not .deb

[/Offtopic]

@Dark Star

Fullscreen mode's not been working properly for me.
Plasma_Snake
Jun 19, 2008 at 11:05 PM
So in context of Windows PC, what is it:confused: a new media player or just a tinker toy? In any of the case, where to get it?
MetalheadGautham
Jun 19, 2008 at 11:10 PM
So in context of Windows PC, what is it:confused: a new media player or just a tinker toy? In any of the case, where to get it?
use the SVN client :p

And its originally designed for the Xbox. So it must kompile on Windows too. Though kompared to linux, performance will sucK.
Plasma_Snake
Jun 20, 2008 at 8:55 AM
I still don't get you MetalHead :confused:
infra_red_dude
Jun 20, 2008 at 12:58 PM
So in context of Windows PC, what is it:confused: a new media player or just a tinker toy? In any of the case, where to get it?
Its like Media Center for Windows and its available for all the platforms out there.
Pat
Pat #27
Jun 20, 2008 at 1:41 PM
Thirdly, I agree Ubuntu Ultimate Edition may not be upto it, but one can NEVER insult Linux Mint. Its not just Ubuntu + Codecs. If prakash wants to see "proper" mint, let him see the light edition. Linux Mint light vs Ubuntu Main will show that Linux Mint wins. Why ? Because its just easier to use, Feels more comfortable, and has an excellent set of themes. Its the greenish mint look, mint wallpapers, mint themes, mint menu and the mint tools that make linux mint what it is. Infact, after using lots of, and I mean lots of distros, I can safely say Mint appears to be the most friendly to use distro ever designed. In My Openion, linux mint is something like "the way ubuntu should have been".

Please explain the difference between Linux Mint and Ubuntu Ultimate Edition (apart from the few tools that Mint has created)

And one must not forget that there DO exist other great desktop distros as well. Sidux is IMO the best desktop for a non beginner to intermediate stage user. PCLinuxOS is an excellent newbie distro, which is a classic example of a RED HAT based distro which uses .deb instead of .rpm . Slackware is the best example of linux at its sweet best. Vector Linux is the best light weight distro which still manages to offer great tools for nearly everything.

Errr...What ? PCLinuxOS uses .deb ? :D

The reason many people like prakash (and me) are happy with debian sid is mainly this: Its pefect for lazy bones. Daily updates, everything automated, and a rolling release, so no need to use a CD to reinstall OS when new version comes out. And its light and has vast repositories. This makes it a perfect canditate for most people.

If I am not mistaken one of the main reasons why you quit ubuntu was that it was too "simple" for an expert like you..Now you are saying exactly the opposite!

First you say you need to hand-configure everything as you are an expert and then you ask for a GUI tool to update your fstab or grub (dont remember what thread it was)

Are you sure of what you need ? :p
Plasma_Snake
Jun 20, 2008 at 2:00 PM
Its like Media Center for Windows and its available for all the platforms out there.
So where to download it from coz the link given in the thread starter's post had no "Download" option :(
infra_red_dude
Jun 20, 2008 at 2:49 PM
So where to download it from coz the link given in the thread starter's post had no "Download" option :(
From the homepage mentioned in the first post: *xbmc.org/

Direct link here: *sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=87054&package_id=260464&release_id=585323
bikdel
bikdel #30
Jun 20, 2008 at 4:17 PM
Offtopic:

*MetalheadGautham* bangs his head against the wall a hundred times.

PClinuxOS what ?

@gautham; it confuses me. Do you actually guess your way through or what? Lolz! :D

Added: No offence meant...